It is not of a matter of Uber being allowed to operate under appeal, It’s the difference between TfL refusing to renew a license and a revocation.
Every accident here-on-in should be considered as a catastrophic failing on behalf of the regulator to do the right thing.
There is no protectionism; Uber lie so people believe that the innocent victims in this battle are the Silicon Valley billionaires pursuing global industry dominance.
The Economist perpetuate this myth via the IEA, and TfL has bought into this fabrication for 7 yrs.
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) have been accused of offering donors access to government ministers and civil servants.
This organisation is literally a scourge on transparency in British politics...and they have the cheek to lecture others on ‘protectionism’.
TAXI LEAKS EXTRA BIT :
From here on in, victims of Uber rape, Uber sexual assault, Uber road traffic accidents and Uber account hacking, need to directly sue TfL themselves for not revoking this unsafe, unfit operator.
They have the power to do this and would have used that power with any other operator who committed these types of contraventions.
The only way to settle this now is in court !!!
TAXI LEAKS EXTRA BIT :
From here on in, victims of Uber rape, Uber sexual assault, Uber road traffic accidents and Uber account hacking, need to directly sue TfL themselves for not revoking this unsafe, unfit operator.
They have the power to do this and would have used that power with any other operator who committed these types of contraventions.
The only way to settle this now is in court !!!
No comments:
Post a Comment