Friday, January 26, 2018

Theresa May, "Women Are NOT Objects To a Be Used By Men"...Unless TheyWork For Uber.

LETTERS TO TAXI LEAKS, FROM LAURENCE GREEN:

 "The answer isn't to shut Uber down" said Theresa May.

        


So finally the cab driver that went to see Theresa May in her constituency gets his answer; while at the same time Uber gets a massive plug on the World stage yesterday at the Davos World summit – regardless of the fact Uber embraces the value of being corrupt and epitomises everything a business shouldn't be.

IMO, Uber runs its worldwide operation like organised crime mobsters, yet the UK' PM sees them as a viable entity - she shows no concern or empathy to the ruined lives this corrupt company leaves in its wake: 

Fraud, perjury, rape, tax evasion, corruption, lies and a regulator infested with corrupt corporate criminals, and Theresa May sees all of this as making a few mistakes along the way – it is my opinion that this government and in particular Theresa May has no moral compass whatsoever!
In a previous posting I questioned whether we actually live in a real democracy, or some sort of fascist state; I am convinced now, more than ever it is definitely the latter – when legislation, laws and regulation is used to oppress and victimise, no other conclusion can be reached!

Theresa May and the Mayor Sadiq Khan, are fully aware that Ubers appeal is one that can never be upheld in a court of law, as Uber obtained their licence to operate fraudulently – this on its own is enough for Uber to lose the appeal on day one!

If you read between the lines of Theresa Mays speech in Davos, it's clear the agenda isn’t to ban Uber; but to alter the regulations by removing the stumbling blocks in legislation to legitimise what is at present totally illegal – this isn’t the politics of democracy at work, it's the politics of fascism, driven by corporate greed – it will take time to do this – this is why I believe TfL didn't revoke Ubers licence and opted for an extension followed by a refusal to renew. It IMO it gave TfL the opportunity to obfuscate things and distance themselves from the corruption.

Serious fraud crimes have been committed at all levels – this isn’t hearsay, its fact, backed by a plethora of undeniable evidence - yet TfL haven’t contacted the police to investigate; as if they did, TfL would be found to be complicit in the fraud – It doesn’t surprise me the police aren’t involved, the police IMO are also complicit with this fascist agenda.

I seriously do not believe there is one real socialist MP in the House of Commons; they all seem to be on side with the governments fascist agenda to let Uber survive at all costs, all morals are to be put aside on this issue - They all seem to be busy hopping around like ducks in the HOC in outrage that a journalist masquerading as a hostess got a pat on the arris at the Directors fund raiser at the Dorchester hotel – Yet no outrage over one person a week being raped in a Uber vehicle, bloody hypocrites!

If there were any justice in this world, the corporate criminals and their co- conspirators would face criminal charges – And Uber/ TfL would have to pay back every penny they have fraudulently obtained to compensate for the damage they have caused. Millions in revenue has been lost, and lives have been ruined in this fraud!

L.Green


TAXI LEAKS COMMENT : FROM GRANT DAVIS 
After again being a cheerleader for UBER on National TV, this idiotic PM makes another crass statement.

So the women who suffered the 48 sexual assaults by UBER drivers last year deserved to be “used by men” then?


Theresa May’s husband is a senior executive at a $1.4tn investment fund that profits from tax avoiding companies.

TAXI LEAKS EXTRA BIT 
BY LAURENCE GREEN.

 
Davos Revisited...
To further add to my earlier posting I would like to bring to your attention that Theresa May and Sadiq Khan are meant to act appropriately, by impartially making decisions with probity in mind and shouldn't’ meet, endorse or support companies involved in criminal behaviour or activity.

Theresa May' speech at the Davos summit yesterday - extolling the virtues of a corrupt, fraudulent company which obtained a PH operators licence with fraudulent intent, is not only morally corrupt, it surely must be in breach of the HOC Code of Conduct.

It is my opinion the Uber appeal against the TfL licence decision cannot be won, as the Uber operators licence was obtained fraudulently – to date this fraudulent company has harvested millions, upon millions of pounds and shipped the money out of the country by the truck load, using tax haven loopholes to creatively avoid paying taxes. Surely this is against the public interest !

There is also some questionable doubt whether the regulator TfL is as innocent as they claim to be, everything points towards TfL being a willing participant, by deliberately failing to be diligent in scrutinising Uber as a company and the legality of its app against legislation.

Much of what has been unearthed by FOI requests points towards malfeasance, corruption and malevolent intent to allow a crime to be committed, with complete impunity for all involved, no matter what their level of involvement.

I think Theresa May should be reported for breaching the HOC Code of Conduct and Sadiq Khan be held accountable for not ensuring the police carry out a criminal investigation - Crime has been committed under their remit of office and their actions are questionable under the circumstances, to say the least.

Bellow are four clauses in the HOC Code of Conduct, that IMO Theresa May has breached.


Duties of Members :
4. By virtue of the oath, or affirmation, of allegiance taken by all Members when they are elected to the House, Members have a duty to be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen, her heirs and successors, according to law.

5. Members have a duty to uphold the law, including the general law against discrimination.
6. Members have a general duty to act in the interests of the nation as a whole; and a special duty to their constituents.
7. Members should act on all occasions in accordance with the public trust placed in them. They should always behave with probity and integrity, including in their use of public resources .

Most diligent taxi drivers have written to their respective MP's in good faith and have received patronising replies I believe are in breach of the HOC Code of Conduct - their elected MP's have belligerently replied failing to acknowledge laws have been breached and broken, making it quite clear they have no intention of acting upon their constituents behalf as they are taxi drivers; this I believe is discrimination!

L.Green

TAXI LEAKS FINAL COMMENT:


FOI requests from the LCDC to the Met showed that #UberRape increased by 50% in the following year to 48. That's almost one a week....



6 comments:

London said...

What a disgrace on a world stage promoting a dubious to say the least u.s company
is she not the British pm supporting British companies and attributes a greedy pathetic government with a weak leader

Anonymous said...

Why is she promoting a company who’s driver recently killed a British embassy worker for wearing a skirt?

colin said...

About 3-4 years ago i wrote to my Mp about uber & all that's going on,my answer from Dr Philip Lee was ----- if we find they are operating illegally we will change the law to make them legal,May is no different to him,this lot would sell there grans for a quick pound.

Listen to the Obama speech in panama a few years ago about disruptive technology & legislation is now cross border not local,it said it all,then listen to what Boris said a few weeks later in Boston,there speeches hold our answers.

And the Tl post i think is spot on any trade deals with the Usa will involve letting Uber continue,i'm really beginning to think these day's that Russia is a safer option than the Usa.

Anonymous said...

Yes indeed. Corrupt government. Dictated to by business, greed and filling pockets of the wealthy at expense of everyone else and morals. Control media, who are incidentally also owned by the same big business that dictates government policy against the ordinary working person, who happens to be in the majority. You all get your vote, so use wisely. Think what category of persons you fall into. Are you very very wealthy, if so vote Tory, the rest of us may differ.

Anonymous said...

There Ms May goes again!
Uber did not revolutionise the taxi industry they pinched the idea from Gett and Hailo. Then used cheap labour to flood the market and cut 25% commision out of there underpaid work that has the work force sleeping in their vehicles being exploited to the point that suits foreign corporate needs. Safety legislation and victims of crime cases swept under the carpet.

Surely the lies of worker protection and blaming corporate companies for being irresponsuble when this government wont enforce law but turns a blind eye instead and diverts attention should be addressed.

Worboys! All the law makers trying to stop one serial rapist getting his parole while turning a blind eye to an entire army of unchecked drivers is a rouse to brainwash the public and divert attention.

Beware of telling corporate companies to act responsible as
allowing 13,000 drives with dodgy CRBs does not set a good example but shows how two face you are Ms May!

Anonymous said...

Unpatriotic Tories. You cannot be patriotic for your country if you support foreign companies who avoid tax over home grown companies. Therefore voting Tory would be unpatriotic for me.