Saturday, May 10, 2014

Hendy states live on TV that St. Thomas Street is the councils responsibility not TfL's.



Peter, Oh what a tangled web we weave.

Hendy stated live on @LondonLive powerlunch (sky channel 117, Virgin 159 and Freeveiw 8) that St. Thomas Street is the councils responsibility not theirs...Wrong of course, as it's managed entirely by TfL as a Red Route.


Hendy also try's to give the impression he's just found out about the license renewal delays. "I said to Leon this isn't good enough, if you've paid your money you should get your licence".
Well Peter all you have to do is reintroduce temporary  licences that you personally withdrew!
  
Still it deflects the story and as TfL are concerned, its job done. Let's not forget, this is the man who appeared on LBC saying the reported increase in sexual assaults were the product of a militant drivers blog, even though they were published on TfLs own website.

So let's look back at the last week or so in the cab trade.

The Shard demo went ahead and caused disruption, well done to all who took part or if not able to attend, gave messages of support, with some good sound bites and articles in the papers.

Über (endorsed by Boris) now embedded on Google maps that's on billions of smartphones worldwide. PH are also on the hook here ,no wonder they are asking for our support (after years of undermining us). Imagine the scenario with a certain large minicab operator.

His drivers lease their vehicles from a leasing company and are fitted out with a mobile device for accepting
work, offered by the company. But as far as the company are concerned the drivers are not employees. 

Nothing stopping them then from having Über on their phones and accepting work paid at a higher rate than the company pay. 

Soon the company could have trouble covering some of the accounts they do at a dramatically cut rate.

Now, if they instruct their drivers only to accept company work, would this make them employees... which has big implications.

The taxi apps are also under the same threat. We the working drivers however, can go back to doing what we completed the KOL to do and that is Ply for Hire. 
But to do our job efficiently, what we need most of all are Ranks (100's of them, not just a handful, plus real enforcement).

Virtual Taxi Meters:
Don't lose sleep about the virtual meter issue, the trade could spend many thousands on a court case and the day before Über could just decide to go to another pricing model, what's needed here is the TfL board to instruct Hendy to suspend Über's operating licence until this and many other grey ares are resolved. You don't get your licence until all the boxes are ticked, neither should anyone else.

We need to accept as a trade, that TfL and the Mayor have no interest in our wellbeing. 

We know it must be galling for those trade Orgs that engaged with TfL to realise it was all a carefullyn constructed plan to keep us divided and give us nothing. 

Let's now accept that the UTG negotiated in good faith, but we're let down big time.

It's no good dwelling in the past, we all need to move on, TOGETHER.

So what's to do?

More drive-ins.

More flash mobs.

Picket TfL. 

Picket the Mayor.

Leaflet GLA, TfL Board and Surface panel meetings.

Promote locally, nationally and internationally, a campaign to halt the race to the bottom that is Über.

Use every tool we have to ensure the GLA bring TfL to account, expose the untruths, the inadequate oversight from the TfL board.

Campaign for a stand alone taxi licence authority, well away form the incompetence at TfL.

Talk to your Councillor, MP, MEP and government minister.

Explain to your passengers the dangers for them and their families.

But as the song goes:

"More, than this"....much more than this

UNITE or DIE.

Together we are unbeatable

I'm Spartacus 


17 comments:

Anonymous said...

I suspect that Hendy is right regarding St Thomas Street as it is NOT a main road through the Capital.

Why therefore is is red lined?

There must surely be a Traffic Management Order to prove one way or the other

Steve. said...

What a great article!

'Let's now accept that the UTG negotiated in good faith, and were let down big time.'

Let's move on together, no exclusions.

Each organisation brings different strengths to the table, very powerful when put together.

We all want the same result.

Jon said...

Think the LTDA are gonna go it alone.

BBC and CITY AM. Have both announced on there web site that the LTDA have organised a massive demo in June. They are predicting it will bring chaos to the capital.,



Gerald Coba said...

Is this man for real
A taxi driver text me and said we cashed his check but he hadn't recieved his licence!

The only cab driver who has Hendy's phone number is possibly Oddy.

If I'm wrong and you have Hendy's phone number, please put it on here so the thousands of taxi drivers and minicab drivers, out of work waiting for their renewals to arrive, can send him a text.

Wonder if Ms Rachel Grundy's go his mobile number.
He's definitely got hers.

Anonymous said...

Anyone got that clip of Hendy, telling Peter Hulme Cross at a GLA transport committee,

"when you come out of the Grosvenor house at midnight, you can't get a black taxi. They take their money to quick and go home at 9 o'clock"

We should have realised back when he was just a liar

Anonymous said...

Fantastic article jimmy
Again this is what Taxi Leaks does best
The news that counts

Editorial said...

Anon 2:52
Not me, Spartacus👀

Anonymous said...

The truth will eventually come out, it always does.
Hendy will make one mistake too many, tell one lie too many.

That's why he wants us dead because we know where the skeletons are all buried

And Daniels is right behind him looking to take the job on
The higher you get the bigger the fall

I predict there will be more scandal to come!
Who was the other TfL boss shagging the brass?

Mike said...

Spartacus,
Excellent article. You are a fountain of knowledge, common sense and good advice. If only others were so articulate as you!

Andy G said...

Why did he not say to Leon Daniels, if this chap has his DBS (CRB) back, issue him a temporary licence.

Why Not,? I will tell you why, it's exactly zero to do with public protection, TfL have sub contracted out and that contract has no capacity to issue them.

It's about cost cutting nothing else.

Anonymous said...

Peter,

If you give us your mobile, we will contact you ASAP.

No the world does not owe us a living but TfL owes us a clear obligation for fair treatment, prompt delivery and NO bullshit.

TfL control strret management of St. Thomas's Street

Rachael Grundy said...

Of course, Sir Peter is a liar and a cheat
Just ask his wife

Hoi Polloi said...

All this proves is that gentlemen Jim Rainbird needs to be more choosy who he picks up!

Windsor house to Buckingham palace

ROADER!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Hoi Polloi
Well it obviously paid dividends when poor old a Jims bill never got renewed in time. He just Text his buddy Pete and bosh, job done.

Anonymous said...

In reply to first comment at 1215am by anonymous, TFLs website confirms that St Thomas St is a red route.

https://www.tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/red-routes/rules-of-red-routes

https://www.tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/red-routes/red-route-maps?intcmp=2189

https://www.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/red-route-central-area-map.pdf

Unknown said...

If the full amount of drivers cheque was cashed, as Gerald Cobra states at 2:28, then Tfl have taken the money that is for issue of a licence and therefore he ( the driver) must be compensated for any time that elapses between the time the issue of licence fee is taken and the receipt of said licence since the only thing stopping him working from that moment is not having a licence in his possession to permit him to work!!

If they had only taken administration costs then that would be different, but only the full sum of a cheque can be taken so this means legally that Tfl are satisfied they can issue this licence, otherwise they are taking monies under false pretences.....surely!!

Anonymous said...

Thank you 2 x annons re it being a red route - it still begs the question as why is a cul-de-sac creates such importance?
Even when it eventually becomes a through road - it still is only a minor road within TfL jurisdiction